Notices tagged with eucalyptus
Notices
-
!SCALE attendees claim I #troll'ed @gregdek w/ question re: #Eucalyptus ©AA & proprietary relicensing. Could someone explain why it's troll?
-
@quaid, #Eucalyptus doesn't have a #FLOSS business model. It has a proprietary business model that uses FLOSS to advance its aims. #Mikos
-
!SCALE: @gregdek seems sincere in dislike of #Eucalyptus ©AA & proprietary relicensing. But he insists that proprietary is needed for $$$.
-
!SCALE: @gregdek is trying to claim #Eucalyptus is !GPLv3 for normal copyleft reasons. If so, then why is ©AA mandatory?
-
!SCALE: IMO #OpenStack is broken as @gregdek says,but at least it's trying non-profit. #Eucalyptus == !GPLv3'd cripple ware. see ur1.ca/e0az
-
!SCALE: @gregdek studied his boss' (Mikos) methods well:use #Eucalyptus' !GPLv3 -ness to attack permissive license. Sullies name of copyleft
-
@gregdek says #OpenStack is a problem because it doesn't support #AWS. Makes me wanna follow the money from #Amazon to #Eucalyptus.
-
@gregdek says #CloudStack is only "Open Source *Now*" (meaning: "maybe not later"). That's what #Eucalyptus already is. Pot:Kettle:Black.
-
OTOH, I'm not surprised @gregdek loves @sabdfl, since #Eucalyptus is cripple-ware proprietary relicensing in #Shuttleworth's mindset.
-
Kudos to @webmink for giving #Eucalyptus a well-due hard time re: proprietary relicensing on #FLOSS_Weekly 184, which I just listened to.
-
@j1mc, or,at the very least, #Eucalyptus should use the extra terms @rms proposed a while back. I'm quite sure #Mickos doesn't: ur1.ca/1ubir