Notices tagged with fedora

Notices

1. bkuhn

   @fontana, I have just informed @spot that the #mustard, in fact, indicates failure, not progress. I'm sure you'll agree. #Fedora #RedHat

   about 4 months ago from identi.ca in context
2. bkuhn

   #IMAP #TLS configuration can be tricky. If it's #offlineimap, I may be able to help, notwithstanding I use #Debian & not #Fedora.

   about 6 months ago from identi.ca
3. bkuhn

   @fontana, IMO #RedHat uses #Fedora as a marketing brand plus open R&D to both improve & market #RHEL. Don't you think?

   about 7 months ago from identi.ca
4. jeffg

   @fontana I like the Blue Eyeball 2.0 USB mic. not pro, but very good sound and amzn has it at a great price. works perfectly in #fedora 15.

   about 9 months ago from identi.ca at Atlanta, Georgia, United States
5. jeffg

   adapted http://ur1.ca/4v85k to build #faif brcmsmac.ko from linux staging tree for !fedora 15, replacing kmod-wl. bonus: !ipv6 now works!

   about 9 months ago from identi.ca at Marietta, Georgia, United States
6. bkuhn

   @sazius, @singpolyma, Do these solutions work on !Debian squeeze? That's probably my main issue. @fontana, is this what you do on #Fedora?

   about 10 months ago from identi.ca
7. bkuhn

   @jonobacon asked !OSCON audience "Does anyone use !Ubuntu?" @fontana raised his hand. Wonder how the !Fedora team at !RedHat feel about that

   about 10 months ago from identi.ca
8. bkuhn

   @fontana, I agree !Fedora has some elements of !FaiF in it. I think the license list, for example, has serious software freedom dedication.

   about 11 months ago from identi.ca
9. bkuhn

   @fontana, what do they say: "It's !RedHat … & the rest"? Is !Fedora actually fully a #GilligansIsland #OpenSource Project, beyond © notice?

   about 11 months ago from identi.ca
10. bkuhn

    @fontana, I was being kind. Most !RedHat folks involved in !Fedora say that it's an independent community of which RedHat is a member.

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
11. bkuhn

    @pchestek, meanwhile, what's the "both purposes" here? Note: !RedHat developers say !Fedora is a community only tangentially related to RH.

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
12. bkuhn

    @pchestek,I didn't "co-opt" it. I explained how incorrect © notice makes unlisted contribs feel bad. You claim !Fedora website © is *right*?

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
13. bkuhn

    @fontana, Do you mean, things like the !Fedora #CLA, that default back to non-copyleft if copyright holder forgets to specify?

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
14. bkuhn

    @fontana, I like your "end Gilliagan's Island © notice" post to !Fedora list. However,I wish you'd given me name credit for coining phrase.

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
15. bkuhn

    @rahulsundaram, is any SRPM code under copyleft at all? What's the usual license for the actual SRPM work in !Fedora in most cases?

    about a year ago from identi.ca
16. bkuhn

    @fontana,current !Fedora "FPCA" (aka #CLA) defaults to permissive license;Tricks contributors into giving permissive patches to !GPL'd works

    about a year ago from identi.ca
17. bkuhn

    @fontana,Yes,I'm too opposed to #CLA's defaulting to permissive license (eg !Fedora CLA.) Should default to copyleft-only for copyleft works

    about a year ago from identi.ca
18. bkuhn

    @fontana, funny to see !RedHat employee saying so, given !Fedora took so long to give up #CVS. #Subversion still has features !Git doesn't.

    about a year ago from identi.ca
19. bkuhn

    @fabsh, why do you not want to sign the !Fedora #CLA. I have issues w/ it, but @fontana & @spot are right that it's better than most.

    about a year ago from identi.ca
20. bkuhn

    @rahulsundaram, Is there a #btrfs fsck yet? ISTR that's not done yet. I'm surprised !Fedora 16 will default to it without that.

    about a year ago from identi.ca